GREEN BAY, Wis. (WFRV) – A lengthy Green Bay city council meeting on Tuesday night ended without a definitive answer about what would become of a controversial veterans housing project on the city’s east side.
Alders chose to refer the project back to city staff to work out some legal issues and address concerns from community members. Alderman Brian Johnson emphasized the council’s support for veterans and their desire to try to work with Veterans 1st of Northeast Wisconsin (the organization doing the project) to try to make this happen somewhere in the city. He said a project site change might be in order, but it’s up to staff to determine the best course of action.
The project would build 21 tiny homes for veterans in need of housing on St. Anthony Drive. Proponents of the project said this will be life changing for veterans in need and that it’s the least that they can do to support the veterans who gave so much to this country.
19-year-old wins USBC Queens title, $60,000 at Ashwaubenon Bowling Alley
Project officials said they’d call the new tiny homes community ‘Veteran’s 1st Cottage Court Village.’ It will also include a community center with mental health, job placement, and other services and will get built in three phases.
There are people who aren’t fans of the project. Many in the Schmitt Park Neighborhood Association (the neighborhood where the project site is located) have been very vocally opposed to the project throughout its approval process.
They said they have concerns about the project site’s proximity to a burial ground, worry about the safety of having a village like this, and also question the professional credentials of those leading the project.
Former UWGB coach Sundance Wicks explains leaving Green Bay
There’s another veterans housing building, a juvenile detention center, and the county’s coroner office in or near their neighborhood so some people feel like city and county officials just dump all their projects in their neighborhood.
There was also some discrepancy with how the land used as the project site got designated (as land exclusively used for veterans to live or preferred as veterans living). Alders said part of the reason they wanted to send the project back to city staff was so that attorneys representing the city and the county can iron out some of those discrepancies.
Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Signup bonus from
